Village considers bond financing and a possible referendum for a proposed water treatment plant.
Glen Carbon, August 18, 2025
Glen Carbon officials are preparing to issue bonds to fund a proposed new water treatment plant after a $27 million state loan application was denied. The Finance Committee approved an ordinance to allow the village to seek private financing authority while preserving a 30-day “back door” referendum that lets residents gather signatures to put the bond question on the ballot. The full village board will consider the ordinance next, and if adopted the village would solicit construction bids and compare costs against continuing to buy water from outside providers.
Village officials in Glen Carbon are moving toward using bonds to pay for a proposed new water treatment plant after the state declined a requested $27 million loan. The finance committee approved an ordinance that would enable a back door referendum, a petition-driven process that allows residents to force a public vote on the bond plan if enough signatures are gathered within 30 days.
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency rejected Glen Carbon’s application because the village did not score high enough in a competitive funding round. Village officials say the state program is prioritizing communities with the most urgent needs, and the agency did not immediately provide comment to village requests. In response, village staff are preparing to seek authority to issue bonds for private financing while continuing to pursue any available state help.
The two-step approach starts with the board asking voters to authorize borrowing. If the full village board approves the ordinance when it meets later this month, residents will have 30 days to collect signatures to place the bond question on the ballot for March 17, 2026. If no petition is filed in that window, the village would be free to move forward with bond sales. If a petition reaches the threshold, voters will decide whether the village may borrow the money.
The measure approved by the finance committee only grants the board the power to issue bonds. It does not obligate the village to build a new plant. Committee members emphasized that granting bonding authority would not delay the project or change the schedule for getting construction bids. Officials plan to get bids once authorization is in place and then compare the cost of building to the cost of continuing to purchase water from outside suppliers.
The village finance committee that cleared the ordinance is made up of three trustees. The committee’s approval sends the ordinance to the full board for final consideration. Village administrators are framing bond authority as a way to maintain options: if bids show the project is too expensive, the village can continue to buy water instead of building.
Glen Carbon closed its own water treatment plant in the 1990s and has since relied on other providers for drinking water. The village initially bought water from a neighboring community and now relies on a private regional supplier. That supplier has proposed a new permanent contract if the village decides not to move forward with its own plant, which makes the comparison between buying water and building a plant immediate and practical.
Local officials say the choice comes down to long-term cost and control. If a new plant can be built and operated for less than or comparable to ongoing purchase costs, the village could regain local control of treatment. If bids come back much higher, the village could elect to stay with outside providers and accept a long-term purchase contract.
The full board is expected to consider the ordinance at its upcoming meeting. If the board approves it, the 30-day petition clock begins. A successful petition would put the bond question on the March 17, 2026 ballot. Officials emphasize that petitioning for a public vote would not change the village’s schedule for getting bids for construction; bids would still be sought on the original timeline so the village and voters can see real cost numbers before making final choices.
Officials describe state funding programs as highly competitive and geared to the most critical public health needs. With state dollars unlikely for now, the village is preparing to secure private financing authority as a backup. Bond financing would allow the village to lock in funding if bids are favorable and move quickly if the community chooses to build.
Nearby school and municipal projects are also moving forward this year. A local school district has planned an unusually large summer construction program, including secure entry upgrades, roof replacements, solar panel installations and building additions funded by recent bonds and district budgets. These projects show the type of local work that can affect demand for construction services and influence bid pricing in the region.
The state denied the village’s request for a $27 million loan because the application did not score high enough in a competitive process. State officials prioritized projects with the most urgent need.
A back door referendum is a petition-based method that lets residents force a public vote on a bond or ordinance. If enough voters sign within the allowed petition period, the issue goes to a public ballot.
Residents would have 30 days to submit a petition to put the bond question on the March 17, 2026 ballot. If no petition is filed, the village can proceed with bond financing. If a petition qualifies, voters will decide.
No. Authorizing the ability to issue bonds does not obligate the village to build. It only allows the board to borrow if it chooses to do so later.
Village officials say the petition and potential referendum would not change the timetable for requesting construction bids. Bids will be gathered under the planned schedule so cost estimates are available for decision-making.
For now, current water service from outside providers continues. If construction proceeds and a new plant opens, the village would regain local treatment capability. If construction is deemed too costly, the village may accept a long-term contract with the current supplier.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Denied state loan | $27,000,000 request denied by Illinois EPA due to scoring in a competitive process |
| Primary backup plan | Seek authority to issue bonds for private financing while pursuing state aid |
| Citizen action option | Back door referendum via petition within 30 days after board approval |
| Potential ballot date | March 17, 2026 — if a valid petition is filed |
| Committee | Village finance committee of three trustees approved the ordinance |
| Does authorization equal construction? | No — authorization only allows borrowing; construction requires later action |
| Current water supply | Village has relied on outside suppliers since the local plant closed in the 1990s |
| Next official step | Full village board to consider the ordinance at the upcoming meeting |
Dotternhausen, Germany, August 18, 2025 News Summary A 10 MW industrial waste‑heat recovery system has been…
Wilton, Connecticut, August 18, 2025 News Summary Wilton Center Lofts, a four-story apartment project at 12…
Cabarrus County, North Carolina, August 18, 2025 News Summary Cabarrus County has seeded a $2 million…
Anchorage, Alaska, August 18, 2025 News Summary First National Bank Alaska shares moved above their fifty‑day…
Little Rock, Arkansas, August 18, 2025 News Summary Major construction activity in Little Rock includes a…
Nottingham, England, August 18, 2025 News Summary A Nottingham-based governance, risk and compliance software company has…